RecurPost Pricing: Accounts, Daily Posts, Add-ons and X Fees
- Current monthly Starter, Personal and Agency are $9, $25 and $79; yearly billing is a separate commitment.
- Their daily maxima are ten, twenty and eighty posts per social account, with extra-capacity options separately priced.
- Account, teammate, AI, storage and X-related charges can belong on different budget lines.
- An account tool or varied content does not establish permission, independent identities, higher reach or guaranteed publishing.
RecurPost pricing combines account bundles, daily per-account maxima, included users and extra services. Starter, Personal and Agency should not be ranked using a theoretical full-capacity denominator alone. A plan with more possible daily slots is not proof that those slots will be used or that publication succeeds. This review uses the current official page checked October 11, 2026, identifies an internal permissions inconsistency and gives explicitly hypothetical budgets. It does not provide an actual checkout, a verified publishing benchmark or an account-protection promise.
Price the accounts, people and operations you require. Maximum theoretical capacity is a planning boundary, not observed output or cost per successful publication.
Start from the current plan and billing term
RecurPost’s current monthly Starter includes two accounts and one user for $9; Personal includes five and one for $25; Agency includes twenty and three for $79. Daily maxima are ten, twenty and eighty posts per account, respectively. Enterprise is quoted for larger or custom requirements. Record the current currency and term beside the capacity table. An annual equivalent is not the amount charged every month under a monthly agreement.
For a hypothetical owner, two managed accounts can fit Starter’s connection allowance while five can fit Personal’s. That answers only the count question. Required formats, daily work, approvals and team access need their own checks. Treat the listed 14-day no-card trial as an evaluation opportunity with its stated conditions, not proof that every intended action will work or that your final bill is known. Do not claim an account-specific checkout or completed trial when the evidence is a public pricing page.
- Capacity: Hypothetical: 5 × 20 × 30 = 3,000 slots. Personal full-utilization planning arithmetic; not accepted publications.
- People: Hypothetical: $79 + (2 × $20) = $119. Agency five-user budget excludes other services and applicable taxes.
- X usage: Hypothetical: 30 × $0.20 = $6. Only the named vendor-described link-post usage; not a complete invoice.
- Permission: Current role FAQ and matrix differ. Confirm exact plan access; no browser or account-protection guarantee.
Label maximum arithmetic as theoretical capacity
An illustrative thirty-day calculation multiplies included accounts by the daily maximum and thirty: Starter gives six hundred possible slots, Personal three thousand and Agency forty-eight thousand. Dividing $9, $25 and $79 by those figures gives approximately $0.015, $0.00833 and $0.00165 per theoretical slot. These are explicitly hypothetical full-utilization ratios. They do not measure successful posts, audience reach, content quality or a vendor invoice per publication.
Use the actual busiest-account requirement before averaging. In a hypothetical five-account plan, one account needing twenty-five daily posts is not covered by a twenty-post per-account maximum just because four quiet accounts lower the overall average. That is a planning mismatch under the stated definition, not a tested publishing failure. The current pricing FAQ describes additional daily capacity as an add-on, so a larger base plan is not the only documented route to investigate. Confirm the relevant action, format and counting conditions rather than inventing a universal fix.
Build the quote from required add-ons
The page lists extra accounts at $4 monthly, teammates at $20 and additional daily capacity at $20 for ten posts per account. These are separate resources. For a hypothetical Agency team with five people and twenty accounts, the stated user arithmetic is $79 plus two times $20, or $119 monthly. That does not include taxes or other required services. Buying a user is different from buying a connected account, even when both involve a person operating social profiles.
A second hypothetical budget can reserve $10 for an AI-post block of two hundred and $10 for an AI-image block of two hundred. Those charges belong to the specified creative units rather than to the number of accepted social publications. The page also documents storage and RSS charges with their own conditions. Include only services you actually require, and mark any unresolved consumption rule. Do not automatically add every listed service or describe the base subscription as a complete invoice for a workload that uses extras.
Keep X fees and permissions separate from plan capacity
RecurPost’s current X FAQ states a $0.20 charge for a tweet containing a link, funded from its X Wallet, and says the balance can also cover analytics fetches. That is a current vendor-described charge, not a zero-cost operation included in every connection allowance. For a hypothetical month with thirty eligible link-post charges at that quoted rate, the named usage line is $6. It does not price other operations, actual account eligibility or the entire social-management subscription. X’s own current pricing also distinguishes write requests from resource-based reads; a raw polling count is not a complete invoice.
The current page’s role-and-permission FAQ says roles are available from Starter, while its feature matrix places those permissions on Agency and Enterprise. This review does not silently resolve that contradiction. Obtain confirmation for the specific role and plan before relying on it. Agency approvals and reports are consistently described as plan conditions, but a public feature description is still not an actual approval record. A browser session, a separate IP or a content variation likewise does not establish a platform-method exemption or prove that multiple accounts are treated independently.
Review the workload before choosing a bigger allowance
Keep a worksheet for each required account: audience question, content type, expected daily work, responsible reviewer and destination. A hypothetical retailer can plan one product explanation and one customer question without assuming that filling all possible daily slots is useful. Review wording, visuals and sources before distribution. The relevant budget is the eligible work you intend to complete, not a maximum denominator chosen to make a subscription look inexpensive. This is an editorial planning example, not measured evidence of a recommended posting cadence.
RecurPost’s current matrix lists AI content and image tools, an inbox and replies, so it should not be described as a service that never helps create content. Assess the particular outputs and controls you need. If a narrated video is missing, evaluate that production result separately instead of assuming a greater publishing allowance supplies it. NoobClaw’s bounded local record below shows one export with limitations, not a RecurPost benchmark, external publication or a revenue result. Preserve actual downstream statuses and measurement windows when deciding whether the completed workflow was useful.
Choose the output you need: post-caption drafts, opening-line drafts or spoken-script drafts. These text tools have a limited anonymous allowance; they do not transcribe or publish a video.
For the related content and workflow decisions, read RecurPost vs Buffer: Current Prices, Daily Limits and Teams and Social Media Tool Pricing Models: Compare Workflow Costs. Each review has its own evidence and scope.
An exported asset does not fill a publishing allowance
NoobClaw publishes this article. Its public October 10, 2026 execution record documents one local creative run: 441 English input characters became a 32.6-second video at 1080 × 1920 pixels and 30 frames per second. This establishes one input and exported file. It does not establish scheduler integration, client approval, platform publication, rights clearance or audience response. Generic or off-topic footage needs scene-by-scene review; voice quality and footage rights were not independently approved. Use the record to evaluate a separate production output before assuming it replaces a publishing or coordination service.
The script-to-video guide and public creative execution record document a local video result, not external-platform publication. Check the current product offer against the supported action you need.
Frequently asked questions
Is cost per theoretical slot the cost of publishing a post?
No. The example assumes every included account uses every daily slot across thirty days. It does not show actual utilization, an accepted post or successful publication. Use the real workload and observed statuses separately.
Can I always replace a higher plan with extra accounts?
No. Extra connections do not automatically add the required daily allowance, approvals or other features. Compare an eligible complete configuration. A marginal add-on price can also exceed the average price of included accounts.
Does the current page fully resolve lower-plan roles and permissions?
No. Its matrix and FAQ disagree on that specific condition. Ask for confirmation for the plan and role you need; this review does not certify an unresolved access requirement or assume that a paid tool grants platform permission.
Sources
Official material reviewed on October 11, 2026. Document conditions apply to their stated service and scope; the editorial examples are explicitly hypothetical.