Vista Social vs Metricool (2026): A Profile Bill Against a Brand Bill
- Fetched 2026-09-17: Vista Social is $79 / $149 / $349 per month for 15 / 30 / 70 profiles and 2 / 4 / 8 users, with no free plan.
- Metricool prices in brands and shows four separate blocks - annual EUR, annual USD, monthly EUR, monthly USD. Annual EUR: 16 (5 brands), 29 (10), 43 (15), 69 (25), 130 (50). Monthly EUR is 20 / 37 / 5
- A brand bundles one profile per network, so one business on eight networks is 1 Metricool brand but 8 Vista profiles - and 15 unrelated single-platform accounts are 15 of each.
- Vista sells the inbox, reviews, listening and DM automations; Metricool sells reporting depth. The X connection is a $10 per account per month add-on on Metricool.
Run the obvious comparison and Metricool wins by a mile: EUR 43 a month for fifteen brands against $79 a month for fifteen profiles. Run it a different way — one business publishing to eight networks — and Metricool wins by even more, because that is a single brand at EUR 16.
Which should make you suspicious. When one side wins every version of the calculation, you are usually comparing the wrong unit, and you are certainly not pricing what the expensive product is for. So here is Vista Social vs Metricool with the units fixed, from both pricing pages read on 2026-09-17.
Today's numbers, with the billing period labelled
Source: vistasocial.com/pricing, 2026-09-17. No free plan; 14-day trial.
| Plan | Monthly | Social profiles | Users | $/profile |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Professional | $79 | 15 | 2 | $5.27 |
| Advanced | $149 | 30 | 4 | $4.97 |
| Scale | $349 | 70 (extra in blocks of 10) | 8 | $4.99 |
| Enterprise | Custom | Unlimited | Unlimited | — |
The page advertises "save 20%" on yearly billing and lists yearly prices of $758 and $1,430 for Professional and Advanced — which is exactly 20% off twelve months. The yearly figure printed for Scale, $3,638, does not match 20% off $349 (that would be $3,350.40), so treat the Scale annual line as something to confirm at checkout rather than a number to plan with. Add-ons are priced separately: listening across social, web and news from $75 per month, employee advocacy from $199 per month for 25 employees.
Source: metricool.com/pricing, 2026-09-17. Metricool renders four price blocks on one page — annual EUR, annual USD, monthly EUR, monthly USD — which is why USD figures look unstable if you fetch it twice without noticing the toggle. Using the EUR column, as we do throughout:
| Plan | Brands | Annual billing (EUR/mo) | Monthly billing (EUR/mo) | EUR/brand (annual) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Free | 1 | 0 | 0 | — |
| Starter | 5 | 16 | 20 | 3.20 |
| Starter | 10 | 29 | 37 | 2.90 |
| Advanced | 15 | 43 | 54 | 2.87 |
| Advanced | 25 | 69 | 87 | 2.76 |
| Advanced | 50 | 130 | 172 | 2.60 |
For reference, today's USD block shows the same ladder at $20 / $36 / $53 / $85 / $159 annual and $25 / $45 / $67 / $107 / $210 monthly — not a currency conversion, a separate price list. Whichever you quote, say which one it is.

The unit trap: a brand is not an account
Metricool's own FAQ defines it plainly: each brand represents a business, brand or customer, and under each brand you can connect one profile per social network or ad platform. Vista Social counts each connected profile individually.
That produces two opposite outcomes from the same price list:
- One business, eight networks. Metricool: 1 brand — the free plan almost covers it, Starter certainly does at EUR 16. Vista Social: 8 profiles, so Professional at $79. The gap is roughly fivefold.
- Fifteen unrelated single-platform accounts. Metricool: 15 brands, so Advanced at EUR 43. Vista Social: 15 profiles, so Professional at $79. Still cheaper, but the gap narrows sharply — and this is the shape most matrix operators actually have.
Metricool's pricing rewards accounts that group. It quietly punishes the opposite shape: many unrelated single-platform accounts that refuse to be bundled into anything.
There is a third shape worth pricing, because it is the one agencies actually have: eight clients, each on four networks. Metricool reads that as eight brands, so Starter at EUR 29 covers it with room to spare. Vista Social reads it as 32 profiles, which means Advanced at $149. That is a large gap in list price for the same publishing work — and it is the point to stop and ask what the difference buys, because for an agency the answer is often the part you get paid for: approvals, a shared inbox, review responses and a report with your own logo on it.
Two more things that move the bill. First, Metricool's X (Twitter) connection is an add-on at $10 per connected account per month, on every paid plan — ten brands each needing X adds $100 a month on top of a EUR 43 subscription. Second, the free plan is cut by platform, not just by volume: it excludes LinkedIn and X entirely, caps you at 20 posts a month, 30 days of analytics and five competitor profiles.
When Vista Social is the better pick
If you only publish and report, the two-thirds of Vista Social you would never open is not a bargain at any price. But there are clear cases where it is the right invoice:
- You reply for a living. Vista's engagement inbox, review management (Google Business and similar) and DM automations are the product; Metricool's inbox is thinner and its review handling is not comparable.
- You need seats with roles. Vista includes 2 / 4 / 8 users with custom roles and permissions; Metricool's collaboration story arrives on Advanced, along with API access, Looker Studio and the approval system.
- Clients connect their own profiles. Scale adds client profile connect and white-label reporting — agency plumbing that Metricool answers only with a Custom plan.
- You want listening. It is an add-on from $75 per month, but it exists as a first-party feature.
And when is neither the answer? When your bottleneck was never scheduling or reporting. If the actual job is producing content that differs for every account and interacting at a pace that does not look scripted, both of these are dashboards on top of a problem they do not solve. That is the slot NoobClaw sits in — publishing through your own local browser logins, with per-account personas and randomised human-paced activity — and it is a different purchase from either tool here.

A four-question decision list
- Can your accounts be grouped into brands? Yes, and Metricool's per-brand price collapses. No, and you are paying per account either way.
- Do you need X? On Metricool that is $10 per account per month on top. Count your X accounts before comparing headline prices.
- How many humans need logins? Vista includes 2 / 4 / 8; Metricool gates collaboration behind Advanced.
- Do you answer messages in the tool? If yes, Vista's $79 buys something real. If no, it buys panels you will never open.
More on both: Vista Social alternatives (why $79 is the entry fee, not the ceiling), Metricool pricing in euros vs dollars, Metricool vs SocialBee on brands versus profiles versus workspaces, and the method itself in fixing the unit before you compare prices.
FAQ
Is Metricool cheaper than Vista Social?
On list price, yes, at every comparable size: EUR 43 a month (annual billing) for 15 brands against $79 a month for 15 profiles. But the gap depends entirely on whether your accounts group into brands, and it narrows once you add Metricool's $10 per month X add-on for each X account you connect.
Why do Metricool's dollar prices keep changing?
They are not changing — the page renders four price blocks (annual EUR, annual USD, monthly EUR, monthly USD) and a fetch can land on any of them. Today: annual USD $20 / $36 / $53 / $85 / $159 and monthly USD $25 / $45 / $67 / $107 / $210. The USD list is priced separately from the EUR list rather than converted, so always label which column and which billing period you are quoting.
Does either have a free plan?
Only Metricool: one brand, up to 20 scheduled posts a month, 30 days of analytics history, five competitor profiles, and no LinkedIn or X connection. Vista Social has no free tier, only a 14-day trial.
